Tuesday, July 22, 2008
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46f96/46f96f8484901abd00a7930d619f717b656a903f" alt="http://www.ces.purdue.edu/extmedia/images/grain.jpg"
It's a bit of an old article (in the blogging world) being from April (shock, horror). However, I wanted to refer to it because one thing I don't get is why she refers to it being paradoxical that it takes more grain to produce a calorie of meat than it does to produce the equivalent calorie with grain alone. To me it follows logically because our bodies (and the bodies of animals generally) aren't one-to-one calorie converters as far as I know, maybe I'm wrong here... That being said, the rest of the article is good.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1aacf/1aacf5a2cc8e501b0c959e88723c40d5e88d9997" alt="http://www.chewingthecud.org/beef.jpg"
Were I tempted to give up meat (previously, I dallied with vegetarianism for a while, and no-read-meat diet, and pescatarianism...) the 'grain required for meat' vs. 'grain required to feed the world' argument would probably be one of the strongest reasons. It's a bit hug-the-tree hippie-ish, but it makes sense to me and still makes me wonder whether I should give up meat entirely. It was biltong and steak that brought me back though. That and thinking about market forces and pricing. Hmm...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Currently have 0 comments:
Post a Comment